ROVQIX provides full-stack developers working across React and Next.js on the frontend, Node.js and TypeScript on the backend, PostgreSQL for data, and containerised deployment — able to deliver a complete feature without handoffs between specialists.
For teams under about fifteen engineers, the handoff between frontend and backend costs more than the specialisation gains. A full-stack engineer removes the queue.
Design to deploy
Shared types
To start
Trial period
One person takes a feature from ticket to production: schema, API, interface, tests and deployment.
TypeScript across the stack so a backend field rename becomes a compile error, not a production bug.
Schema, indexes and migrations handled as part of the feature rather than requested from another team.
CI, environment configuration and release handled by the same person who wrote the code.
Deep enough in each layer to make good decisions, honest about when a specialist is genuinely needed.
Decisions and runbooks written down as work happens, so context does not live only in one head.
| Full-stack fits when | Specialists fit when |
|---|---|
| Team is under ~15 engineers | Large team with defined ownership |
| Features span the whole stack | Deep work in one layer |
| Handoffs are slowing delivery | Parallel work streams are efficient |
| One codebase in TypeScript | Different languages per layer |
| Startup or product team | Platform or infrastructure team |
For an MVP or a well-defined product area, often yes — particularly with a designer and a clear roadmap. Beyond a certain scope you want at least two so knowledge is not concentrated in one person.
TypeScript throughout: React and Next.js on the frontend, Node.js on the backend, PostgreSQL and Redis for data, Docker and CI for deployment.
Yes. They join your board, your reviews and your standups, and adopt your conventions rather than importing ours.
We plan a handover: documentation, pairing sessions and a tapering period. Several clients keep us at part-time capacity afterwards for overflow work.
Indicative ranges in USD. Every engagement is quoted to a written scope before work starts, so the number you approve is the number you pay.
$2,200 / month
20 hours per week
Best for: Early-stage products moving steadily
$4,000 – $6,500 / month
40 hours per week
Best for: Continuous delivery on a roadmap
from $9,500 / month
Ongoing
Best for: Building a product without hiring a team
How we think about this work, in more depth.
Hire developers
A 30-minute call, then a written proposal with scope, price and timeline within two to three working days. No retainer required to get a real number, and no obligation if the answer is that we are not the right fit.