ROVQIX builds websites and learning platforms for schools, universities and edtech companies — enrolment flows, course delivery, student portals and content-heavy institutional sites — with WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility treated as a build requirement rather than a later audit.
Education buyers check accessibility before they check anything else. A platform that fails a keyboard test does not get past procurement, regardless of how good the product is.
Build standard
Tested, not assumed
LMS integration
Works on poor connections
Semantic markup, keyboard operation, focus management and screen reader testing across every flow.
Multi-step forms with save-and-resume, document upload, validation and clear status communication.
Content structure, progress tracking, assessments and completion records for learning platforms.
LTI and API integration with existing learning management systems rather than replacing them.
Large site architectures with real information hierarchy, search and multi-department publishing.
Built to work on school networks and home connections that are slower than your office assumes.
| Stage | Common need |
|---|---|
| Early product | MVP with course delivery and billing |
| Selling to institutions | SSO, accessibility conformance, audit logging |
| Scaling | Performance under a class of 500 hitting submit at once |
| Integration demands | LTI and LMS integration for existing systems |
| Data requirements | Progress reporting and export for administrators |
The transition from selling to individuals to selling to institutions is where most edtech products need engineering work: SSO, roles, audit trails and conformance documentation all become prerequisites.
We provide detailed documentation of what was tested and the conformance level reached. For a formally signed VPAT an independent accessibility firm is the right route, and we remediate against their findings.
Yes, via LTI or their APIs where available. Integration is generally better than replacement — institutions rarely want to move their LMS.
Yes. Enrolment periods are predictable, so we load test in advance, cache aggressively, and queue the write-heavy operations rather than hoping the database copes.
Yes. K-12 typically brings stricter data handling requirements and lower-bandwidth constraints, both of which we plan for explicitly.
Indicative ranges in USD. Every engagement is quoted to a written scope before work starts, so the number you approve is the number you pay.
$6,000 – $20,000
6–12 weeks
Best for: Schools and universities
$20,000 – $60,000
10–20 weeks
Best for: Edtech products and course delivery
$5,000 – $20,000
4–10 weeks
Best for: Platforms failing procurement review
How we think about this work, in more depth.
Education
A 30-minute call, then a written proposal with scope, price and timeline within two to three working days. No retainer required to get a real number, and no obligation if the answer is that we are not the right fit.