ROVQIX provides technical SEO as an engineering service: we audit crawling, indexation, canonicalisation, site architecture, structured data and Core Web Vitals, then implement the fixes in your codebase rather than handing over a report.
Most technical SEO audits die in a backlog because the recommendations are written for an auditor's checklist rather than a developer's ticket. We write and merge the fix.
Not just reported
Rendering understood
Validated at build
Coverage tracked after
What Google can reach, what it chooses to index, and where crawl budget is being wasted on parameters and duplicates.
Whether your content is in the HTML or only appears after JavaScript — the single biggest technical risk on modern sites.
One indexable URL per piece of content, with parameters, pagination, filters and locales handled deliberately.
Article, Product, FAQ, Breadcrumb and Organization schema generated from real data and validated in CI.
Internal linking and hierarchy so authority flows to the pages that matter and nothing is orphaned.
Field-data performance work, since the assessment uses real user data rather than your lab score.
Because content that only exists after client-side JavaScript may be indexed late, partially, or not at all.
Google can render JavaScript, but rendering is queued and resource-constrained, and other crawlers — including several AI answer engines — do far less of it. Content in the initial HTML is indexed reliably; content that appears only after hydration is a gamble.
No. We do the technical and engineering side. Content strategy and digital PR are separate disciplines, and we would rather work alongside a specialist than do them badly.
Yes, frequently. They set strategy and priorities; we implement the technical work in the codebase. That combination usually works better than either side alone.
Indexation and crawl fixes show within weeks. Ranking improvements take one to three months and depend on competition and content quality — technical SEO removes obstacles rather than creating demand.
For audits, yes, on any stack. For implementation we are strongest in Next.js, React and Node.js, and will tell you when your platform needs a specialist instead.
Indicative ranges in USD. Every engagement is quoted to a written scope before work starts, so the number you approve is the number you pay.
$1,500 – $4,000
1–2 weeks
Best for: Understanding what is holding the site back
$4,000 – $14,000
4–8 weeks
Best for: Fixes that actually ship
from $1,200 / month
Ongoing
Best for: Sites publishing continuously
How we think about this work, in more depth.
Technical SEO
A 30-minute call, then a written proposal with scope, price and timeline within two to three working days. No retainer required to get a real number, and no obligation if the answer is that we are not the right fit.