ROVQIX builds web software for insurers and brokers: multi-step quote and application flows with save-and-resume, agent and broker portals with scoped access, claims and case workflow with approvals, and document handling with versioning and retention.
Insurance software is mostly about two things people find tedious: long forms and documents. Both are where the conversion and the operational cost actually live.
On every long form
Every state change
Enforced at data layer
Increasingly required
Multi-step forms with save-and-resume, per-field validation, honest progress and mobile document upload.
Scoped access per intermediary with policy status, documents, commissions and submission tools.
Multi-step review with roles, approvals, comments and a complete history of who did what.
Upload, generation, versioning and retention — the substrate most insurance processes run on.
Immutable records suitable for regulator and internal audit review, queryable when asked.
Connecting to policy administration platforms via API, replica or scheduled export.
Because they are long by necessity and designed as if they were short.
| Feature | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Scoped visibility | Brokers must see only their own book |
| Submission tooling | Reduces back-and-forth by email |
| Commission visibility | The most-checked screen in most portals |
| Document exchange | Replaces attachments, which are the weak point |
| Status without calling | Removes a large share of inbound queries |
| Bulk operations | Brokers work in batches, not one policy at a time |
We build the technical controls: role-based access enforced at the data layer, immutable audit logging, retention schedules, encryption and documented data flows. We complete security questionnaires in writing as part of onboarding.
Regulatory interpretation, policy and compliance sign-off remain with your compliance function. We build to what they specify rather than advising on what is required.
Where an API, read replica or scheduled export exists, yes. Some older platforms are genuinely constrained, which is why we confirm feasibility during discovery rather than after you commit.
We architect systems that do, with least-privilege access, audit logging and retention. Development uses seeded or anonymised data rather than production copies.
Yes — per-account tiers and scoped visibility enforced at the data layer, so what a broker can see is a property of the query rather than of the interface.
We build the interfaces and workflow around rating, and integrate with your rating engine. Building an actuarial rating engine itself is specialist work outside what we do.
Indicative ranges in USD. Every engagement is quoted to a written scope before work starts, so the number you approve is the number you pay.
$2,500 – $6,000
2–3 weeks
Best for: Defining scope and integration feasibility
$20,000 – $70,000
10–20 weeks
Best for: Agent portals and claims workflow
from $1,800 / month
Ongoing
Best for: Systems your operation depends on
How we think about this work, in more depth.
Insurance
A 30-minute call, then a written proposal with scope, price and timeline within two to three working days. No retainer required to get a real number, and no obligation if the answer is that we are not the right fit.